The quiet moments before I start work ever since Fahrenheit 9/11 descended upon this country like a giant, flaming clown has been nothing but political jabber. A show of hands on Monday revealed that I’m the only Republican-leaner in the bunch. I usually put on my headphones whenever the poli-speak cranks up, however, because the commentary is usually terribly slanted with no point, or just plain short-sighted. (Maybe a side-effect politics happening in a side office in a information technology building at 8 AM, which is likely below the water cooler and above the children’s playground for most prolific discussion area.)
Today’s discussion was a result of the news of Saddam being handed over to Iraq to be put on trial. Iraq has legal custody, but the US keeps physical custody. To paraphrase a co-worker on the subject, “That’s like me saying you can have my PlayStation, but I still get to keep it at my house.” Everyone laughed, nodded, and agreed. It’s just that simple. Iraq is being taken for such a ride! He’s just a Playstation!
I did a quick Google to see how many Playstation have been sold since its release in 1995. 100 million says the official report from May 25th, 2004. Number of Saddam Husseins available in the world: one. So, just from a quantitative perspective, holding with Saddam Hussein is not the same as holding onto a Playstation, because there are 99,999,999 more PlayStations than Saddams, and that makes walking down to Target and buying a Saddam64 (comes with Pork Wars!) not much of an option for anybody.
Here’s a more accurate analogy: If I live in a mortar-and-brick house, and you live in a wooden shack (sad, really), you’d be wiser to store your fancy new one-of-a-kind home entertainment system at my place until you build your own brick abode. Keeping it at the shack creates a bigger chance that some other A/V monkey is going to break in and run off with it, and then you’ll never again will either of us watch Independence Day in 11000p and 3D SquishyVision.
The reason for Iraq not getting physical custody quite yet is more likely due to the lack of solidity in the Iraq miliary and justice system, and the US’s excellence and presence in that same aspect. It would great for Iraq to have total custody of Saddam, but having the thought of such a amazingly high-important character guarded by a force that might be inadequate — meaning, increasing a chance of rescue or escape — is a situation to be avoided. The idea of Saddam having friends in the region wanting to spring him is far from possible, it’s probable — just his defense team for the upcoming trial is 1,500 lawyers!
Both sides are doing the smart thing: Iraq is taking personal matters into their own hands by handling the trial, and the US is there to make sure Hussein’s at the stand on time.
RSS 2.0 (recent 10 posts)
